Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person in charge of the above construction, who has implemented construction works for a new ew farm in four lots, such as Jeonsung-gun B, etc., and where the area of a business plan is at least 7,500 square meters in a production management area, the small environmental impact assessment shall be conducted.

No small-scale project implementer subject to consultation on environmental impact assessment shall commence any construction works for the relevant project before the consultation procedure is completed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from February 2017 to the first police officer of the same year.

3. By up to 28, the construction was commenced prior to the completion of the consultation on small environmental impact assessment in performing a new breeding house construction subject to the small scale environmental impact assessment with the area of the business plan of 28,523 square meters in the said 4 parcel, such as the above B, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written accusation (Evidence No. 2);

1. Application of statutes on field inspection photographs;

1. Article 74 (2) 2 and Article 47 (1) of the Act on the assessment of the relevant criminal facts, the impact of selective punishment on the environment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel believe that it is not necessary to undergo a small-scale environmental impact assessment when starting the construction of a new eropos, and that since the defendant started the construction without going through it, they do not constitute a crime under Article 16 of the Criminal Act because they do not constitute a case where there was no criminal intent in violation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, or at least there was justifiable reason to believe that their acts do not constitute a crime under the law.

2. According to the Act on the Assessment of Environmental Impact of the relevant statutes (hereinafter “Act”), a development project implemented in an area requiring conservation and an area requiring planned development in consideration of environmental conservation as difficult development.