logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2014.06.26 2013고단518
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

2,50,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Godan518] The defendant is a person who falsely runs and attends the surroundings as he knows that he knows it is very close to the son of the former president, who is a pro rata of D former president. F was well aware that the defendant is walking and walking as above.

On March 19, 2010, H, a Vice-Speaker of the G City Council, was issued a detention warrant under the charge of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) in order to support the Cheongju District Court on 19, 2010, and H was detained in the Chungcheong detention house. On March 22, 2010, H proposed that “F, a vice-chairperson of the Cheongju District Court, was released from bail or suspended execution by exercising its influence through E by the President, who met the victim H in the Chungcheong detention house.”

Accordingly, H had a friendly person I talk about F. F. F. F. F on March 23, 2010, F. F met with H’s friendly K and I’s friendly K and I on the trade name in front of the J, while she follows them, H’s phone calls to the Defendant, and explained the Defendant in detail about H’s criminal case, and if H’s soon begins, how much the money enters.

The defendant is not a lawyer.

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle or arrange legal services, such as solicitation, legal counseling, preparation of legal documents or other legal relations, with respect to investigative cases or other general legal cases handled by an investigative agency, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits.

The Defendant, at around 16:30 on March 23, 2010, talked with the above F to the effect that “40 million won may be released on bail. In this context, the Defendant, at the time of telephone conversations with the said F at a non-place on March 23, 2010, the Defendant expressed to the effect that “The Defendant would appoint an advisory lawyer who was capable of going through E as a defense counsel and send the H money to release without the framework of H,” and that the above talks to I.

arrow