logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.04.18 2017나24756
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 13, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the purchase of goods with A (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and entered into a contract for the purchase of goods with “1,645,000,000 won, the delivery term machinery and materials ( April 15, 2014), installation and performance test (see, e.g., May 10, 2014), threeA, 7A, and 7B (hereinafter referred to as “the instant goods”), the high-tension heat supply period of 6 nuclear power plants, C. 6 nuclear power plants, 7A, and 7B (hereinafter referred to as “the instant goods purchase contract”), and completed the performance test on or around April 2014.

B. From August 8, 2015 to November 28, 2015, while the Plaintiff planned and improved the 8th plan for the 6th nuclear power plant, the Plaintiff confirmed that the signal was generated as long as the ECT inspection on the instant product conducted on September 26, 2015 (inspection measuring the thickness without destroying the heat pipe) was conducted on the heat pipe, and the thickness of the instant product was found to fall short of the prudential assessment criteria (46.5%) for heat exchange with the thickness of the heat (46.5%). As a result of the EC inspection conducted on October 6, 2015, the Plaintiff requested that the Plaintiff be present at the inspection, technical assistance, and cooperation in analyzing the causes of the subsequent measure. 2) The Plaintiff discovered that the PC was conducted on October 29, 2015 to 15 (MM) of the instant product.

Accordingly, on November 3, 2015, the Plaintiff performed the sponsing work (the work of deducting part of the sponsing the sponsor for the analysis and organizational analysis) at four sponsor for the precision analysis of the sponsor heat of the sponsor. On November 7, 2015, the Plaintiff destroyed and analyzed two sponsor among the heat pipes generated from the sponsor.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff is likely to cause an accident and among the instant goods from November 5, 2015 to November 11, 2015.

arrow