logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.21 2017고단438
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On January 1, 2017, at around 07:20 on January 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was working at the “D Pccception bank” located in the store located in the Busan Young-gu, Busan (hereinafter “438”) as an employee; (b) took out the cash amount of KRW 3.90,000,000,000,000,000, owned by the victim within the treasury; and (c) took out the cash amount of KRW 50,000,000,000, in the

In this regard, they were placed in and stolen from the host machine.

[2] On December 28, 2016, the Defendant sold a galthal lusular seal in Busan around December 28, 2016.

“To the effect that “I will first send money to the victim F (39 years old) who reported and contacted the false sales on the Internet NAVV and the Korean car page,” and to the effect that “I will first send the said things to the NAF.”

“.” The purport was “.

However, at the time, there was no intention or ability to send the above things even if the defendant did not have the above things and received money from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 200,000 won from the victim to the wired securities account under the name of the defendant on the same day.

[2] On October 26, 2016, the Defendant (hereinafter “745”) posted a false letter on the Internet NAVV Liberian Republic of Korea to the effect that “I will sell 4 SM-T530” in Busan (hereinafter “TM”) around October 26, 2016, and reported it to the victim G (25 years) who visited the Defendant.

“The message sent text messages to the effect that the message sent.”

In the facts charged, the facts charged were false.

“Although it is written, it is apparent that such content was sent by text messages, and it is not likely to infringe on the defendant’s right of defense because it was changed without any changes in indictment. As such, correction is made as above.

However, at the time, the defendant does not have the above objects.

arrow