Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On January 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a singing practice hall with the trade name “D’s singing practice hall” in Gangnam-si; and (b) even if a singing practice hall proprietor does not sell or provide alcoholic beverages, the Defendant sold six cans that are alcoholic beverages to E, a customer, at around 22:40, the instant singing practice room.

B. Although a person acting as an intermediary for entertainment is not allowed to arrange the entertainment of customers by singing or dancing with customers in a singing practice place for profit, the defendant was demanded by the above E at the same time as the above A, and at the same place as the above E, and arranged the entertainment by having B enter the above room and drink with E and drink with E.

2. Although Defendant B was prohibited from engaging in entertainment with customers by singing or dancing in a singing practice place for profit, Defendant B provided entertainment with customers at the same time as the above 1. A, at the same place as the same time as the above, and at the same place as the above, Defendant B provided entertainment, such as drinking and singing together with E at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. B currency details;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear statements by police officers first crackdownd in a singing practice room);

1. Articles 34(3)2 and 22(1)3 of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act due to the sale of alcoholic beverages as indicated in the judgment) and Articles 34(4) and 22(2) of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act due to the referral of guest acts) of the pertinent law on criminal facts, Defendant B’s Article 34(4) and 22(2) of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act due to the referral of guest acts).