Defendant

All appeals filed by A, F, G and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인들 ⑴ 피고인 A ㈎ 사실오인 피고인 A는 F, N과 이 사건 불상을 훔쳐 국내에서 팔기로 공모한 사실이 없고, N이 이 사건 불상을 절취할 당시 절도현장에 있지 아니하였다.

Nevertheless, the court below found Defendant A guilty of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) among the facts charged against Defendant A.

㈏ 양형부당 원심의 양형(징역 4년)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

The sentencing of the lower court (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

⑶ 피고인 G ㈎ 사실오인 피고인 G이 이 사건 불상을 절취한 것은 사실이지만 나머지 피고인들과 사전에 공모한 것이 아니라 일본에 도착해서야 비로소 다른 피고인들이 이 사건 불상을 절취한다는 것을 알게 된 것이다.

Nevertheless, the court below found Defendant A guilty of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) among the facts charged against Defendant A.

㈏ 양형부당 원심의 양형(징역 3년)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor (Defendant D), it can be sufficiently recognized that Defendant D was guilty of the instant accident, and that Defendant D was involved in the transport.

Nevertheless, the lower court knew that Defendant D was an ordinary movable cultural heritage which was stolen by the instant non-existence.

For the reason that it is difficult to recognize that the defendant was suspected that he was a stolen or stolen ordinary movable cultural heritage map, the court acquitted the defendant D of the charges.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. (i) 3 or more of the relevant legal principles on Defendant A’s assertion of mistake of facts.