beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that concludes a mobile communications agency contract with the KS Telecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Scom”), and engages in wholesale and retail business of telecommunications equipment.
B. The Plaintiff entered into an entrustment contract for the business of selling mobile phone units with RP under the trade name of Q.
C. The Defendants purchased mobile phone devices from R, and entered into a contract for the use of the Ecomcom and the mobile phone telecommunications service through R. D.
R) After entering into a contract for the sale and entrustment of mobile phone services with the Plaintiff including the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff sold the mobile phone model number, machine serial number, and core chip serial number to the medium and high-speed mobile phone seller without leaving them, and acquired the sales proceeds thereof. The Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment on August 12, 2016 by using the personal information of customers entering Q or contacted to open the mobile phone and the serial number of the aforementioned mobile phone number without the consent of customers in the name of the customers, applying the mobile phone number without obtaining the consent of the customers to open the mobile phone in the name of the customers. To this end, the Plaintiff used the aforementioned mobile phone number with the intent to acquire the opening of the mobile phone and policy subsidies. The Plaintiff forged the signature of the subscriber in the name of the subscriber, forged the new contract, and submitted it to the telecommunications company, such as E.K., and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on August 12, 2016 by opening the mobile phone and receiving the mobile phone from the agents without the intention or ability of sale.
[The Daegu District Court 2015 High Court 2466, 4439, 4527, 4582, 4706, 5041, 5450, 5453, 5924, 6110, 6209, 6284, 6366, 2016 Highest90, 2176, 2277, 2280, 2435 (Joint)] AR appealed, but the same sentence was also declared in the appellate court [Tgu District Court 2016No3349, 3483 (Consolidated)]; and R waives the appeal.