logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.08.10 2016고단750
상해등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

Summary of Facts charged

1. On May 17, 2015, the Defendant injured the victim D on May 22 and 00, 2015, in front of the building E in the building E-dong, Chungcheongbuk-si, Chungcheong-si, Chungcheong-si, the victim D (n, 39 years of age) and F, the Defendant’s wife, were injured by the victim’s head knife one time by knifeing the victim’s head knife, and knife the victim’s head knife in excess of the victim’s head knife the victim’s head knife, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as two parts, two parts, and blood species

2. In relation to the injured party G, the injured party suffered injury to the injured party by reporting the Defendant’s appearance to catch DNA head debt, such as the date and time, place, and paragraph 1, and destroying the injured party G (n, 60 years of age) to hand over the victim G (n, f0 years of age) with his hand, resulting in injury to the injured party, including two parts, brain, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

3. The Defendant committed assault against the Victim H by reporting the Defendant’s appearance of harming G, such as set forth in paragraph 1, date, time, place, and paragraph 2, and assaulting the Victim H at one time as he drinks the face of the Victim H (W, 41 years of age).

Judgment

1. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion was that the Victim D was able to report the Defendant’s identification of the Defendant’s F, and that D was put up in the Republic of Korea after the Defendant sought to see D, and that D exceeded the point, and the Defendant also exceeded D.

Since the defendant was taken out by the victim G and the victim H beyond the defendant, there is no fact that the defendant, while facing the defendant, only extending to the part for the purpose of defensive defense, and there is no fact that he was tightly damaging G or Ha.

2. There is a copy of each medical record as evidence that seems to be consistent with the facts charged in the judgment and a statement of the victims in addition to each injury diagnosis certificate.

The statements of victims shall be deemed to have been made in turn.

The victim D, in this court, was in excess of the defendant, as the defendant was living in the aftermath of his head while he was talking about the F with the higher words.

As even live even, her mother has come to live on the floor.

arrow