logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.03.26 2017고단158
변호사법위반방조
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who actually engages in credit business while operating D Co., Ltd. (former E; hereinafter “instant company”) in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and Defendant A was appointed as an internal director of the instant company on June 2013 and engages in credit business with Defendant B from around that time.

On the other hand, the company of this case has operated its business in a way of professionally lending commission fees to clients who requested the case of individual rehabilitation, bankruptcy, exemption, etc. (hereinafter “individual rehabilitation, etc.”) to the law office, etc.

In the meantime, the Defendants introduced so-called “Rehabilitation Royer,” which deals with legal affairs by lending the name of a law firm, attorney-at-law, or certified judicial scrivener, and lent the commission fee to the clients who requested the case, such as personal rehabilitation, etc. However, if the rehabilitation moyer received the relevant loan from the clients who want to borrow the commission fee and transferred the loan to the instant company in the name of the rehabilitation moyer designated by the rehabilitation moyer. The amount of the loan shall be repaid from the clients, and the amount of the loan shall be repaid from the clients, and the amount of the loan the clients have not repaid was repaid in lieu of the rehabilitation moyer, which is jointly and severally liable under the agreement of the temporary business entity that was concluded in advance with

As above, in order to assist F (F) who is not an attorney-at-law from February 201 to May 2012 in handling legal affairs, such as personal rehabilitation, by lending the attorney-at-law in the name of H law firm, Defendant B, despite being aware of the fact that F is a rehabilitation hub, extended to 125 clients who were introduced from F, a sum of KRW 147,80,000 as a commission fee for a case of personal rehabilitation, etc. from July 2009 to January 2016, as stated in the list of crimes listed in the separate sheet of crimes (excluding the list Nos. 39, 17,34,52, 66, and 68 of the separate list of crimes).

arrow