logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.25 2014나6866
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 9, 2011, the Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Defendant for the same year

6.8. Borrowings from the Defendant to the same year;

8. The last day of August 2013, the payment shall be made in installments by 2 million won as of the last day of each month, and even once the said payment date shall lose the benefit of the time, and shall be paid immediately in addition to 24% of the annual damages for delay to the principal due to delay. A notary public, which recognizes the compulsory execution based on the said monetary obligation by the Plaintiff, was drafted the No. 675 of the No. 2011. No. 675.

B. Based on the original copy of the above notarial deed, the Defendant applied for a seizure and collection order as to the Plaintiff’s non-CC Card Co., Ltd., Samsung Card Co., Ltd., Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and the KB Card Co., Ltd., on July 4, 2013. The Defendant applied for a seizure and collection order as to the Plaintiff’s claims against the Plaintiff’s national bank, new bank, Han Bank, Han Bank, Han Bank, Han Bank, New Card Co., Ltd., Ltd., 10433 in the same court. The Defendant applied for a seizure and collection order as to the claims against Han Exchange Bank, and was cited on July 222, 2013. The Plaintiff applied for a seizure and collection order as to the Plaintiff’s non-CC Card Co., Ltd., Ltd., 2014TT Co., Ltd., 2014TB card Co., Ltd., Ltd., new card Co., Ltd, and Samsung Card Co., Ltd.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 10 through 12 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff agreed to be supplied with alcoholic beverages by the Defendant on June 1, 201. In addition, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 50 million from the Defendant as above, but, on March 3, 2013, acquired the said loan claim by the Maritime Alcoholic Beverages Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Maritime Alcoholic Beverages”) upon the receipt of the said agreement.

arrow