logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고정997
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a small-scale car in B as a job.

1. On December 28, 2010, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, driving the said vehicle at around 23:30, and driving the said vehicle at a speed of 20-30 kilometers per hour on the side of a temporary terminal using a two-lane road in the front of the D in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon along one lane.

Since it was difficult to ice from the snow at the time, and the surface was driven behind the victim E (60 years old) drive on the front side, the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as taking the front side and the left side, maintaining the distance from the front side and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and driving the motor vehicle in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was due to the negligence of proceeding, and received the part of the front part of the vehicle in front of the Defendant driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires two-day medical treatment, from the victim G (the South, the age of 35), who was on board the damaged vehicle due to such occupational negligence, and around 2 weeks, to the same H (the age of 23), such as dump and tension, which require two-day medical treatment, and to the same I (the age of 29).

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph (1) and damaged property equivalent to KRW 691,450 in the estimate of the repair of the damaged vehicle, taking the part behind the F vehicle driven by the victim E ( South, 60 years old) and the front part of the F vehicle driven by the Defendant.

3. The Defendant, in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, driven the said vehicle at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph and without any mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copies of each police statement made to E, G, H, I, and J;

1. A survey report, a written estimate, and a written diagnosis;

arrow