beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines 1,500,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 3, 2020, Defendant A shared with the Defendants: (a) in the toilet of “E” store located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on the ground that the victim F (25 years of age, south) was faced with the cell phone and the cell phone was damaged; (b) the victim was sprinked; (c) the victim was sprinked; (d) the victim was unable to get out of the toilet; (d) the victim was able to get out of the toilet; (e) the victim was dried up and dried up; (e) the rear part of the victim was dried up; (e) the victim was tight back to drinking; and (e) the Defendant was tight back to the toilet; and (e) the victim was able to get out of the CCTV; (e) the victim was able to take out of the toilet; and (e) the Defendant A was able to take out the toilet, and (e) the victim was found to have been out of the rest after the victim’s assault was discovered.
Summary of Evidence
1. As to the Defendants’ respective legal statements F, taking photographs of police statements, receipts, CCTV photographs and internal investigation reports (in relation to the attachment of photographs by police officers in mobilization), investigation reports (E CCTV), investigation reports (in relation to attachment of photographs by police officers), investigation reports (in relation to attachment of photographs by police officers), investigation reports (in relation to the execution of search and seizure warrant), application of the statutes governing the exclusion of victims
1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective selection of punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is heavier than the Defendants’ criminal liability in light of the content of the instant crime, and Defendant A and B had the same criminal records. However, the Defendants led to the confession of the facts charged in this court, the degree of damage inflicted on the victims is not much serious, and the Defendants agreed with the victims (as a matter of agreement, Defendant A was 1.5 million won);