The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and there is no record of criminal punishment after he was sentenced to larceny in around 1976, etc. However, the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendant, but the crime of this case was committed in the boom boom market, etc. in Seoul city, Seoul city, by taking full account of the various circumstances, such as the fact that the victims stolen the cell phone which the victims boomed to their ability of care due to the outbreak of the victims' booms, etc. from the main money or bank, or that the number of thefts is 18 times or more, and the number of thefts is very poor, and the mobile phones of many damaged people are not immediately disposed of, and most of, the crime was not recovered, and the motive and circumstances of the crime, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unfair.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.