(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.01.27 2015고합66

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.01.27 2015고합66

현주건조물방화미수등

Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant frequently attends the E cafeteria in the North-Eup city D before he operated by the victim C (n, 61 years of age) and has a friendly relationship with the victim.

1. A special assault Defendant, on September 11, 2015, refused the victim’s request from the injured party at the above E restaurant on September 14:30, 2015, and died and died of the victim’s brucing and funeral service.

"In doing so, the breath of the victim's breath with her hand, and 2-3 breath of the wall, which is a dangerous object that was pushed down with 2-3 breath of the wall, and assaulted the victim as a brut.

2. The Defendant attempted to commit fire to the present building on the ground of the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and the place set forth in paragraph 1, with the intention of burning 2-3 of the victim’s clothes in the above E restaurant, and setting fire to the above restaurant building by attaching fire to the above clothes, but the Defendant failed to commit an attempted crime, even though the victim, who was in compliance with this intent, did not take the clothes of the fire, and did not take the fluences into the wind to throw away it out.

3. The victim reported the Defendant to the police for the same reasons as paragraphs 1 and 2, and the victim saw that he was fluoring the Defendant into the above E cafeteria building.

At around 18:30 on September 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered a restaurant with gasoline located in the front of the above E cafeteria; and (b) entered the restaurant with the victim’s address after being loaded at the site of a site for work, and reported to the victim “Isk Hask Hask Hask Hask Hask Hask Hask Hask.”

In the same manner, we want to put the gasoline to the city where the gasoline was buried, but it was prevented from being damaged.

As a result, the Defendant prepared a fire prevention against a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2016.01.21 2015고합697

-의정부지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고합302

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.06.30 2016고합91

-서울북부지방법원 2017.05.19 2017고합31

-인천지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고합85