1. Of the instant lawsuit, Plaintiff E, J, S, AG, AH, AU, and net B, the rest of the Plaintiffs except for the CO, which is a lawsuit recipient of Plaintiff E, J, S, AG, AH, AU, and net B

1. Part of the declaration of termination of the lawsuit

A. The facts under the recognition of the facts are clear in, or obvious to, the records.

1) On June 20, 2019, the Plaintiff AD, the chairperson of the labor union comprised of the employees belonging to the Defendant, made a statement to the effect that “The Plaintiff was aware that most of the instant lawsuits were terminated due to the failure of the first instance court, and the facts that the appellate court was proceeding, and there was no intention to proceed with the appellate trial.” The instant appeal filed by the Plaintiff’s legal representative at the first instance court. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s legal representative at the time of the petition of appeal was stamped by the so-called “abdominance” was stamped in the name of the Plaintiffs on the list of mandators attached to the petition of appeal submitted at the time. (2) On July 4, 2019, the court ordered the Plaintiff’s legal representative at the appellate court, who was going to proceed with the appellate trial as the Plaintiff’s legal representative on July 4, 2019, to the effect that “the proxy of the lawsuit, or all of the Plaintiffs, who received a certificate, submitted a certificate of personal seal impression or identification card.

3) As a response to the above order to prepare the above tin, the Plaintiffs who submitted a copy of their identification cards and a certificate of delegation are the CO7 persons (hereinafter “Plaintiff 7”) who are the parties to the lawsuit of Plaintiff E, J, S, AG, AH, AH, AU, and net BW.

(B) According to the above facts, it is recognized that Plaintiff 7 delegated the power of attorney to the appellate court on the part of Plaintiff 7 to the law firmn (it does not necessarily mean that the power of attorney can be proved only by a notarized method, and Plaintiff 7 satisfied all the requirements of confirmation of the intention of attorney in accordance with the order of preparation for the name of the court.

However, it is insufficient to recognize that the delegation of a lawsuit attached to the petition of appeal has granted the authority to the appellate court to the remaining plaintiffs who did not submit a copy of identification card or a certificate of delegation.

Law firms are the defendant, and they are the defendant.