logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2016.06.17 2015가단10031
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver real estate indicated in the annexed real estate;

B. 5,016,790 won and September 2015

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On August 17, 201, the Plaintiff leased real estate indicated in the attachment to the Defendant with a deposit of KRW 5,00,000, KRW 300,000 per month, and KRW 300,00 per month, and period of lease from September 13, 201 to 24 months (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and the instant lease agreement was implicitly renewed.

B. On May 2, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 2,000,000 to the Plaintiff as a rent. The sum of the rent that the Defendant did not pay remains after deducting the full amount of KRW 5,000,000 as of September 16, 2015.

C. The Plaintiff paid KRW 297,530, and KRW 319,260,00 for the period from March 2015 to January 2016, and KRW 616,790 for the period from January 2015 to September 2015.

Since the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached Form, and to return the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 300,00 per month from September 17, 2015 to September 17, 2015, to KRW 5,016,790 ($ 4,400,000,000,000) and KRW 619,790,000,000, in return for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow