logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.03.27 2014고단305
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 6, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on the summary order of KRW 2.5 million, and received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 24, 2009, respectively.

On December 6, 2013, at around 18:18, the Defendant driven B cargo vehicles while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.103% of alcohol content without obtaining a driver’s license from the Do in front of the new rice tea restaurant, rice liquor, and 2-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to the Do in front of the military base located in the same Dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Before judgment: References to criminal records and investigation reports (attached to a summary order) and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Articles 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the order to attend a compliance driving lecture has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that he again commits the crime in this case, the liability for the crime in this case is not provided against the defendant, but the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or higher, and the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or higher, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and character, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered and determined as ordered by the order.

arrow