beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 on December 17, 2014, at the “EM” operated by the victim D on the second floor of the Guro-gu Seoul building C, Guro-gu, Seoul; (b) was engaged in as if he did not have cash or credit card and would pay the drinking value without any intent or ability to pay the drinking value; (c) ordered the beer and beer to the victim; and (d) was obtained from the victim, i.e., e., e., 20,00 won of the market value, i.e., 1., 20,000 won of the beer and 20,000 won
around 23:00 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant, “2015 Highest 32,” was “H main store operated by the Victim G in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F,” and the Defendant, despite that there was no intention or ability to pay the food cost due to the absence of money, was done as if the Defendant could be able to pay the food cost to the victim, and ordered the drinking and food to be paid to the victim. The Defendant, which was obtained from the victim the food amounting to KRW 45,00,00 in total at the market price, such as beer and even even 1.
"2015 Highest 41"
1. Fraud;
A. On December 15, 2014, at around 23:55, the Defendant, at the point of “K” operated by the victim J on the first floor of the building underground of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I to pay the alcohol value despite the absence of the victim’s ability or intent to pay the alcohol value, he/she was provided with the victim with the alcohol and the alcohol equivalent to 100,000 won in total.
B. On December 28, 2014, at around 15:00, the Defendant showed the attitude of paying the drinking value in the “N” main points operated by the Victim M in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City L, even though he/she did not have an ability or intent to pay the drinking value, and he/she acquired the same by deceiving the victim after being provided the victim with an alcoholic beverage amounting to 41,000 won in total.
In relation to each of the above crimes under paragraphs (a) and (b), a prosecutor has instituted a public prosecution with regard to the defendant's pecuniary advantage equivalent to each of the food costs, but the defendant has the intention or ability to pay the price and has received food.