logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.08 2015가합22011
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant,

A. From November 30, 2014, the Plaintiff A’s KRW 110,000,000 and its related thereto:

B. Plaintiff B: KRW 50,000,000.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, a company established for real estate sales business, etc., promoted the development of land for several parcels of land outside F of the private petition area in the Cheongju-si (hereinafter “instant land”), and sold to multiple persons including the Plaintiffs specific parts of the land, the future development of which is to be completed.

B. From August 2014 to January 2015, the Plaintiffs concluded a contract with the Defendant to purchase a specific part of the purchase price (hereinafter “instant contract”) after completing the development of the instant land from the Defendant, and paid part of the purchase price to the Defendant.

Details of the instant contract concluded between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant and the details of payment are as follows.

(E) The terms and conditions of the instant contract and the payment thereof: (a) KRW 45 million ( September 29, 2014); (b) KRW 1.5 million (2.5 million), KRW B-81,61,000,000 on September 13, 2014; (b) KRW 4,500,000 on September 13, 2014; (c) KRW 4,500,000,000 ( KRW 4,50,000,000 on September 13, 2014; (d) KRW 4,61,000 on September 13, 2014; and (e) KRW 4,61,000 on September 29, 2014; and (e) KRW 3,000,000,000 for KRW 4,300,000 on September 29, 2014);

C. The Defendant failed to complete civil engineering works on the instant land until the date of closing the argument of the instant case, and on February 16, 2016, a voluntary decision to commence the auction was made on the instant land, and the auction procedure (Cheongju District Court G) is underway.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, and the purport of Gap's 2 through 7 certificates (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) as a whole, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, the defendant raised objection according to the contract of this case.

arrow