Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Provided, That each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From August 16, 2013, the Defendant concluded a check contract with the branch office of the Bank of Korea and the branch office of the Bank from August 18, 2013, respectively, and from December 18, 2013, the check contract has been made in the name of the Defendant.

On January 20, 2014, the Defendant issued one check number I, check amount “20,000,000,” and the date of issuance “30 March 20, 2014,” in the name of the Defendant to the New Daily Medical Co., Ltd., Ltd., the business partner, at H office in Nam-si, the Defendant issued one check number I, check amount “20,000,000” under the name of the Defendant.

On March 20, 2014, which was the check holder, the ELP, proposed to pay the check.

However, as stated in Section 2, 4, and 5 of the attached Table Nos. 2, 4, and 5, the Defendant issued and failed to pay a total of 5,00,000 won per share for three face value as stated in the attached Table Nos. 2, 4, and 5.

The defendant is a person who is in office as a regular director of H, a corporation in the Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul.

On September 22, 2014, the facts charged that “A, from February 20, 2014 to March 20, 2014, issued five copies of the per share of a total par value of 98,000,000 and did not pay for the shortage of deposits,” the representative director H’s corporation (“C”) was indicted for violating the Illegal Check Control Act with the Daejeon District Court’s branch office of the Daejeon District Court, and is currently pending the trial in the first instance as of September 2, 2014.

By January 22, 2015, the above A only recovered only one of the five copies of the above Table of units by January 22, 2015, and the remaining four copies were not recovered.

Meanwhile, the check number F, par value 28,00,000, and date of issuance on March 22, 2014; and hereinafter referred to as “the check in this case”) in the facts charged in the above case No. 2014 J. 118, the Defendant lent the check to K to be distributed before it was transferred, and the Defendant was distributed to K.