The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime committed before November 19, 2015, and one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime committed after November 19, 2015) is too unreasonable.

2. There are no circumstances to consider the Defendant’s recognition of each of the instant crimes and reflect in depth, and that there is no good health.

However, the defendant not only has the power of the same punishment, but also has repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the number of times is large, and the scale of damage is too severe.

Although a significant portion of the damaged product was returned, it was not received from the victims, and there was no significant change in the situation.

Considering the equity with similar cases of the same kind, the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, the background leading to the instant crime, the means and methods of committing the crime, and the circumstances after committing the crime, the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.