logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.10.19 2017고단1134
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 10, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violation of road traffic law at the Jung-gu District Court on the same day, and on January 25, 2013 at the Seoul Eastern District Court, to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime.

[2] Although Defendant 1 was punished twice or more due to drinking driving, Defendant 2 driven BSP car from around 1 km to the front road of the port port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the port in the state of alcohol level of 0.082% of alcohol level among blood transfusion around August 29, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, investigation report (report attached to a summary order of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (b) the Defendant has no particular criminal record in addition to the fine; and (c) the Defendant’s age, environment, and sexual conduct, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, shall be determined as ordered in full view of all the circumstances.

arrow