A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the field manager of the purchase contract for the goods signed by B and C with the limited company C, requested the submission of the Defendant’s national technical qualification certificate from the vice president D of the limited company C to the Korea Health Management Association. Although the Defendant did not have obtained the qualification certificate as an indoor architectural engineer under the National Technical Qualification Act, he did not intend to forge and submit the qualification certificate to the said type of national technical qualification certificate as if he acquired the above qualification certificate.

1. On May 2017, the Defendant forged official document: (a) in the office B of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., 4206 in the middle and middle order, the Defendant stored the Defendant’s architectural map technician’s national technical qualification in a computer; and (b) then printed out a computer image file with the Defendant operating the Defendant in the way of changing the “construction map technician” of the type of the above qualification in the “indoor Construction Engineer” to “indoor Construction Engineer.”

Accordingly, the defendant has forged one copy of the national technical qualification certificate of indoor architecture engineer under the name of the president of Human Resources Development Service of Korea.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), taken a copy of the national technical qualification certificate of indoor architectural engineer against the forged Defendant as described in paragraph (1) with a cell phone camera, and exercised the forged official document by transmitting it to the cell phone of the vice president D of the company with limited liability that knew of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Entry of D in the second-time police interrogation protocol against the accused in the suspect interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation reports and verification of the authenticity of qualification certificates;

1. Investigation report (to hear again the statements made by C Vice President D Telephones);

1. One copy of the national technical qualification certificate (a forged qualification certificate);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to replies to requests for investigation cooperation;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) regarding criminal facts, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged Official Document).