The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, the above circumstances appear to have already been considered at the lower court, not to recover damages up to the trial, and did not reach an agreement with the victims (the Defendant does not submit any data, even though the workplace rent paid part of the money to the Plaintiff to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.). The total amount of damages exceeding KRW 100 million cannot be deemed to have suffered damage due to the instant crime. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, criminal record, criminal record, character and conduct, motive, means, method, and consequence leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment) cannot be deemed to be unfair, because it is too unreasonable, in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments, including

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.