1. The part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A (including the part of the acquittal and the part of the acquittal of the reasons) shall be reversed.

1. The court below found the defendant A not guilty of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Evidence, etc.) among the facts charged in this case. <2 With respect to the offering of a bribe equivalent to the sum of KRW 608,171,867 on six occasions under the single criminal intent of the defendant A, the court below found the defendant A guilty of giving a bribe equivalent to KRW 22,8950,00,00 in the market price of KRW 302,50,000 in Kimpo-si, Y apartment 302,50,000 in relation to his duties, Kimpo-si, Y apartment 302,50,000 in relation to the provision of a bribe in this case.

Accordingly, the prosecutor filed an appeal on the grounds of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as to the part of the judgment of the court below, except for the payment of air fees, and the part of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud Part III) by the defendants, and on the conviction part against the defendant A, on the grounds of unfair sentencing. The defendant A filed an appeal on the guilty part only on the grounds of unfair sentencing. The defendant A had W purchase in the initial appellate brief of 403,30,000 apartment price of 302,50 and 503, the sale price of which is the same as that of 403,30,000 won in W, and had W purchase in the name of the area of the area of the territory of W in order to grant a bribe of 228,950,000 won, which is an apartment