The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The 6-month imprisonment with prison labor declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects the wrong facts, and that the amount of damage of this case is not so much, but it is recognized that the defendant agreed with the victim or did not take any particular measures to recover damage until the trial is in the court, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case only when he was released from prison for 8 months after completing the execution of imprisonment for the same crime of fraud and for 2 months, and there is no special change of circumstances that may change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the court below was sentenced, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstance after the crime, etc., are considered, so the defendant's argument is not recognized to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too too large and it is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.