beta
Text
The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial, shall be amended as follows:
A. The defendant.
Reasons
1. The assertion and judgment on the grounds of the claim
A. The gist of the assertion was that the Defendant paid a considerable amount of money in a manner that pays off the price in the course of purchasing land on behalf of the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff who knowingly demanded the return of the money, and that the Plaintiff shall not pay the amount by the end of 2010,000 per month in addition to the interest rate of KRW 33,0
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay the principal without paying the interest agreed upon after June 2018. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the said KRW 50 million at the rate of KRW 33,000 per month from June 10, 2018 to the date of complete payment, the unpaid amount of KRW 6,046,000 among the interest accrued during the period from June 201 to June 201, and the unpaid amount of KRW 66,000 (=33,000 per 33,000,000 per month) calculated on March 6 to June 2011 (i.e., the amount of KRW 10,000 per month from October 6, 201 to KRW 20,000 per month from October 6, 2013 to KRW 30,000 to KRW 630,000 per month from March 36, 2013 to KRW 30,3030.1).
B. In full view of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s agreement to pay KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff around November 201, 201, and agreed to pay interest corresponding to the “bank interest” to the Plaintiff from January 201, 201, by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions in Gap’s evidence Nos. 3 through 7 (including each number number), and the testimony of witness C of the first instance trial, including the entire purport of the pleading.
① From 2008 to 2009, the Plaintiff remitted money to the Defendant for the purchase of real estate, and subsequently confirmed that the real estate was purchased at a price significantly lower than the market price, and that the Defendant paid a considerable amount.
I think.