All appeals by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the defense counsel recognized the mistake of the defendant, there is no history of criminal punishment, and the victim I expressed an intention that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant, the sentence of the court below that sentenced one year of imprisonment and confiscation is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the fact that the instant crime by the prosecutor was committed on an organized and planned basis against many unspecified victims, and the social harm and injury is very great, the lower court’s sentence is too uneasible.

2. The judgment of the court below recognized the defendant's wrong, there is no history of criminal punishment, victim I expressed his/her intention that the defendant would not want the defendant's punishment, and the victim D expressed his/her intention that the defendant would not want the defendant's punishment. Meanwhile, the crime of this case is a systematic planned intelligence as a telephone financial fraud crime, not only is the quality of the crime but also is likely to cause social harm as it can grow up to an unspecified number of victims in a short period. In full view of all the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is judged as appropriate, and it is not judged that it is too heavy or excessive, and thus, the above argument is not reasonable.

3. Conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.