1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. (1) content 1A (99%) B (1) B (1) B (1%) FMW 530i (1) on May 31, 2017, 2017, the piracy 2E company G A750TDI on February 17, 2016, when the number of the vehicle involved in the accident of the owner is the first registration date of the vehicle involved in the accident of the owner, and on December 14, 2017, the melting vehicle of 100% of the damage vehicle is the vehicle vehicle with the damaged vehicle.

A. The Plaintiff A and B are co-owners of the automobiles listed in No. 1 of the “automobile column” No. 1 of the following table (hereinafter “each of the instant vehicles”) and the E Co., Ltd. are the owners of automobiles listed in No. 2 of the No. 2 (hereinafter “instant two vehicles”). The damages suffered by the instant vehicle and the instant two vehicles (hereinafter “each of the instant vehicles”) due to each traffic accident listed in the “accident column” as follows (hereinafter “each of the instant accidents”).

B. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to each of the instant accidents.

C. On January 17, 2018, Plaintiff C acquired the right to claim damages from the E Co., Ltd. against the Defendant for each of the instant accidents.

On January 9, 2018, the Defendant paid KRW 2,265,60,00 to Plaintiff A as damages for the decline in the exchange value of the instant one vehicle. The Defendant paid KRW 2,242,94, and KRW 22,656 to Plaintiff B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3 and 6 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Due to the respective accidents of this case alleged by the plaintiffs, each of the instant vehicles suffered serious damage, such as major structural damage, etc., and thus, it became impossible to repair the instant vehicle, which could not be restored to its original state, even after completion of technically possible repair. Accordingly, the damage caused by the decline in the prices of the instant vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “accident damage”).

Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer of the household vehicle, is in the loss of the decline of each vehicle of this case.