The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not agree to walk the side glass of D as indicated in the facts charged, and that the Defendant committed a passive resistance in the course of avoiding or defending the Defendant by finding D at the heart and assaulting the Defendant. This does not constitute an assault, and even if it constitutes a domestic violence, the illegality of the act or self-defense is excluded, even if it constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense, the lower court convicted the Defendant by misapprehending the legal doctrine or by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2. 이 사건 공소사실 피고인은 2015. 2. 14. 01:30경 서울시 송파구 C 앞 노상에서, 피해자 D(51세)이 초등학교 동창인 피고인에 대한 험담을 하고 다닌다는 소문으로 인해 두 사람의 만남의 계기는 오히려 D이 여자 동창과 놀러 다닌 것과 관련하여 피고인(더하여 다른 여자 동창 K)이 이를 험담하고 다닌다고 D이 오해한 것에서 비롯된 것으로 볼 여지가 많다(공판기록 제73, 102, 103쪽). 피해자와 이야기를 하기 위해 만나, 피해자로부터 왼뺨을 맞고 목을 잡힌 채 밀려 가로등에 부딪히는 등 폭행당하자, 이에 화가 나 발로 피해자의 옆구리를 걷어 차 폭행하였다.

3. The court below determined that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense in light of the following facts: (a) based on the following evidence, determined that the defendant committed an assault against the victim by walking the victim's side glass; and (b) further, regarding the argument that "the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense in light of the fact that the victim's loss, etc., who display a deadly weapon towards the defendant, committed the above deadly weapon," the court below stated that "the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense; and (c) the kind of the defendant's act cannot be known by leaving the deadly weapon that the victim committed the victim's act at the time; and (d) the following day of the instant case does not indicate the damage of the medical certificate issued by the defendant upon the medical