logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.25 2015가단10360
구상금
Text

1. To the extent of the property inherited from the net G, the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 6,470,402 won and 3,737.

Reasons

1. As to Defendant A, B, and C

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. As to Defendant D, E, and F

A. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 4, as shown in the reasons for the claim, for the guarantee of the payment of the amount of credit goods under an agreement between the company No. 1 and the company No. 1 and No. 4, the court below concluded a performance guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff to guarantee the payment of the amount of credit goods. The court below accepted the above report under the status of the court below's acceptance on October 27, 2010 and accepted the report under the above performance guarantee insurance contract to the Plaintiff by the deceased G, the company No. 1 and claimed for the payment of the amount of credit goods to the Plaintiff as the company No. 1 did not receive the amount of credit goods from H from the company No. 1 and the plaintiff paid the amount of credit goods on behalf of H company No. 1 and the deceased on August 4, 2010. The court below accepted the above report under the status No. 2510, Dec. 25, 2015.

B. Therefore, the above Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff within the scope of the net G’s inherited property.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow