Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a driver of D's refriger vehicle, and Defendant B is a driver of E's cruise vehicle.

1. On September 28, 2014, Defendant A tried to change the direction, etc. to the right side of the vehicle from the first line to the second line within a two-way distance from the 2nd right line at the New IIC bank of the Mandong-si Mandong-si, Pari City on September 28, 2014, Defendant A tried to change the direction, etc., but the victim B, who is the driver of the E-Korean cruise vehicle operating in the second line, did not take the border and did not change the vehicle. Defendant A overtakend the victim by driving the vehicle of the victim, and followed the above broke, followed the vehicle of the victim, and threatened the victim with the rapid change of the vehicle of the victim three times in the direction of the vehicle of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a dangerous vehicle.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the same time, and at the same place as in paragraph (1) above, tried to prevent the driving of the vehicle at the victim’s D D seal wood by changing the vehicle from the third line to the second line once, and attempted to threaten the victim to suffer from a disease by bringing the vehicle at the victim’s D seal wood, sounding a pair and a horn, and driving away. The Defendant 2 expressed the victim’s desire to “the ring-in, spood, spoo, and west,” “the ring-in, spice, spood.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a dangerous vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement statement B and A;

1. The Defendants: Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act; and Articles 283 (1) of the same Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants need to strictly punish the crimes of this case in light of the strict demands for aggressive actions on the road that are being put from the general public in line with the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the damages caused by such acts.