logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.07.25 2017고단818
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that the Defendant would withdraw the deposited money from “C Company D agency’s account” to the Defendant’s account and grant the Defendant a premium per page; (b) informed the Defendant’s new bank account number (E) in the name of the Defendant to the said D agency; and (c) made a withdrawal of the deposited money to the said account when the deposited money is deposited with the said account.

On January 17, 2017, 10:00, an employee who is in charge of the crime of false telephone finance fraud assumes an employee of the new head office of the bank and calls from the victim F to the victim F.

When the credit card loan is received and repaid KRW 10 million, it is intended to open a Maspbook with 3.5% interest rate of KRW 25 million.

“Along on 12:00 on the following day from the injured party, he/she was transferred KRW 10 million to the said new bank account under the name of the Defendant from the injured party.

On January 18, 2017, at around 13:29, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the Bank Board as “use of office rent deposit”; (b) withdrawn KRW 10 million from the said new bank account in cash and possessed the said false statement to the Bank Board in accordance with the direction of the said D agency; (c) and (d) sent a name in the front of the “I coffee shop” located in the same Gu G No. H 2 adjacent to the “I coffee shop” located in the same Gu.

As above, the name-free party did not deal with the withdrawal of a large amount of deposit using the Defendant’s account that is not a company’s account, and did not send a large amount of money to the Defendant who does not have to face-to-face, and did not accompany the employees of the company while being in charge of the business of withdrawing money in cash. The following is an emergency situation: (a) ordering the employees of the company to make a false statement to “use of office rent deposit”; (b) waiting for a large amount of money at H located at the place of withdrawal; and (c) allowing the Defendant to move and deliver cash to H by holding a large amount of cash at the place of withdrawal.

arrow