logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.09.19 2019노671
업무상횡령등
Text

All appeals filed by prosecutors and defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the charges, which is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts, even though the court below acquitted the victim of this part of the charges, although it could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant took a knife with a knife knife, which is a dangerous object, as if the

B. The punishment of the lower court (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On August 18, 2017, at around 10:30 on August 18, 2017, the summary of this part of the facts charged was determined by the lower court: (a) on the grounds that the Defendant requested the Defendant to submit data necessary for the accounting audit in Seo-gu B Apartment Building D, Seo-gu, Gwangju around 10:30, on the ground that the victim E demanded the Defendant to submit the data necessary for the accounting audit, and (b) on the victim, the Defendant reported the victim as a trial cost, and “by law,” and “a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.).

① The phrase “I would like to see the law. I see it later,” which in itself means that it is difficult to see that there is a content of giving notice of harm and injury to the victim, and the victim expressed in the court of original instance that I would distort the victim specifically in addition to the above words.

arrow