1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the intention of the EB EB member who treated Plaintiff B from August 5, 2016 to September 1, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant member”).

B. (1) On August 5, 2016, Plaintiff A received treatment from Defendant Council members due to infection and heat, etc. (2) On August 11, 2016, Plaintiff A received treatment from Plaintiff A, who was in the form of a symptoms, such as sheshesheshesheshesheshe was in the form of sheshel and shelshel, and received treatment from Plaintiff A, who was in the form of Ginsia located in F in Silst City, with the diagnosis of “pinant finite finite, which is not accompanied by a high wave,” and received opinions from Nonparty A and all of them.

3) On August 13, 2016, Plaintiff A re-entered Defendant Council members and received a total of 12 medical treatment until September 1, 2016. The medical record column for the aforementioned Plaintiff’s medical record included “Weld 200 to 0.6 m. 10 m. 200 m. 8 m. 200 m. 15 m. 2000 m. 8 m. 205 m. 8m. 2000 m. 8m. 8m. 2016 m. 8m. 201. 8m. 6m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m. 8m. 2016. 8m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m.”

Nos. 1 and 14; the results of each request for appraisal to the H Hospital Head of this Court; the results of each request for complementary appraisal; the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Summary of the cause of the claim;

A. The defendant's breach of duty of care, ① the defendant's 's level of 'A'.