logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.22 2016나3821
보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's incidental appeal is dismissed.

2. Incidental appeal costs are borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The following facts of the case are acknowledged as having no dispute between the parties, or as having comprehensively taken account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 20, and 26 (including each number):

A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a subcontract for construction works between the Plaintiff and A (trade name: B) with each of the following construction works (hereinafter “each of the instant construction works”), and the “instant construction works” by each of the construction works.

(i) subcontracted the subcontract (However, the following construction period and the construction cost are finally modified subcontract;

1) On July 25, 2007 1. C Housing Redevelopment 2.4: from August 1, 2007 to November 30, 2010; from March 10, 2010 to March 30, 2010 to March 327, 2010; from March 30, 2010 to April 31, 2010 to April 10; from April 20, 201 to April 3, 201 to April 20, 201 to June 3, 201 to 10; from April 20, 201 to April 3, 201 to June 20, 206 to 3. 4. 20 to June 20, 206 to June 3, 200 to June 20, 209 (1) to 1 to April 20, 2009 to

(3) With respect to other contracts that are contrary to the terms and conditions of this contract, the provisions of this contract shall take precedence over those of this contract.

Provided, That this shall not apply to the matters not provided for in this contract under Article 30 (Special Conditions) by a special agreement between A and B on an equal status.

arrow