logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.18 2017고단1053
사기
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Suwon Faging Board on May 4, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 1, 2017.

[Criminal Facts] The Defendant introduced a nameless female under “C” to D, and borrowed gambling money from the above female, but did not lose all the money due to gambling. D, who had been urged to repay debts thereafter, was suspected of committing fraud, and the Defendant was able to file a criminal complaint against the above female, was refunded money once to the Defendant.

D was known after the proposal to D.

Through E, the victim F(n, 52 years old) was introduced, and the victim was conspired with D to acquire money from the victim.

On July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, Suwon-si Office Officetel G 305 of Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) prepared a purchase-type purchase-type sales agency contract from the Plaintiff Company I, which constructed the 30 households of the D-si office apartment; (d) the Defendant already paid the 390 million won as the down payment to D; (d) the amount of KRW 40 million as the money additionally paid to D; (e) the amount of KRW 40 million as the money additionally paid to D; and (e) after two months, D will be repaid without the mold; (e) if it is impossible to pay back, five households, such as H 102 Dong608, etc.; and (e) if it fails to settle the money borrowed by D, Defendant D would have paid it in lieu of the guarantor, and (e) the end of Dong-gu.

However, even if the defendant and D have borrowed money from the injured party, they planned to repay the gambling debts of KRW 200 million, and at the time D was only liable for the default debts of KRW 700 million in addition to the above gambling debts without any particular property or income, and only have the authority to sell the housing by proxy, and there was no intention or ability to register the transfer of ownership of the apartment.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow