1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is that "Article 20 (1) and (2) of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (amended by Act No. 10204, Mar. 31, 2010; hereinafter "former Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings")" is "Article 20 (1) and (2) of the former Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (amended by Act No. 10204, Mar. 31, 2010; hereinafter "former Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings")" at the fourth and fourth level at the bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the reasoning of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the court of

2. Additional determination

A. 1) Whether the Plaintiff’s assertion constitutes a bona fide third party under Article 20(3) of the former Act on Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Land after the instant replotting cannot be asserted against a bona fide third party unless the purport of the prohibition of separate disposal of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership was registered. However, the Plaintiff had no choice but to trust that the registration of ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership Ownership of Ownership of Ownership of Ownership Ownership.