logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.01.25 2015가단19685
건물명도 등
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is from KRW 50,00,000 to KRW 50,000 from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on March 2, 2016 to the attached list.

Reasons

1. 사실관계 [인정근거] 갑 1∽7, 11호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재 또는 영상, 변론 전체의 취지 원고는 2004. 2. 23. 피고와 사이에 이 사건 부동산 중 제1항 기개 각 토지와 그 지상 건물에 관하여 임대차보증금 5,000만 원, 월차임 200만 원, 임대차기간 2004. 4. 5.부터 2009. 4. 4.까지로 하는 임대차계약을 체결하였다.

At the time, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the line that does not exceed the legal building-to-land ratio for the entire interior repair of the existing building and the construction construction of the prefabricated-type building in the future, but the Defendant would waive the whole building (excluding machinery) to the Plaintiff when the contract period expires.

피고는 원고에게 5,000만 원을 지급하고, 위 부동산을 인도받아 위 특약에 따라 2004. 4. 2. 경량철골조판넬지붕 1층 수퍼마� 77.47㎡, 같은 해

8.6. 6. 1st floor of the light steel-frame, steel-frame, roof, 77.51 square meters of store was extended. On December 17, 2004, the registration of change of indication was completed due to extension as described in paragraph (2) among the real estate in this case.

The instant lease contract was renewed, and on January 1, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease contract with the term of lease on the instant real estate on December 31, 2015, and the monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million.

On November 25, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a content-certified mail to the Defendant refusing to renew the instant lease agreement, and at that time the said mail reached the Defendant.

The Defendant currently uses and utilizes the instant real estate for the purpose of the Smarket.

2. Determination as to the cause of the claim for judgment as to the main claim: Since the lease contract of this case terminated on December 31, 2015 with the expiration date, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff; and the Plaintiff is obligated to return unjust enrichment calculated by the ratio of KRW 2.5 million per month, which is equivalent to the rent, from March 2, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

arrow