beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 40,929,00, KRW 20,284,000, and each of the above amounts, from March 18, 2015.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Urban planning facility project (E Tri-distance Road Construction Works; hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice - F announced on July 29, 2013 - Project operator: Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor;
B. The Central Land Tribunal adjudicates on expropriation on January 22, 2015 - Land to be expropriated: The land to be expropriated shall be as specified in the following table:
(hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). - Compensation for losses: The following phrase “compensation for expropriation” is indicated as “adjudication for expropriation.”
However, because the arithmetic average of the appraised values according to the appraisal of expropriation falls short of the arithmetic average of the appraised values for the compensation for consultation, the amount of appraisal of the compensation for consultation is determined as compensation for losses.
- From the date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation in consultation with an appraisal corporation on March 17, 2015 - An appraisal corporation in the transfer of an appraisal corporation, a national appraisal corporation in the country of a stock company, and a expropriation ruling by an appraisal corporation: a light-day appraisal corporation
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on August 20, 2015 - The amount of compensation for the land owned by the Plaintiff A and B shall be increased to the amount indicated in the “Adjudication on Expropriation” column under the table below, and the objection against the land owned by the Plaintiff C and D was dismissed.
- An appraisal corporation: A’s ruling on expropriation of the land to be expropriated by the Plaintiff, F&M corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”) 179,003,03,270 Won 180,442,467,130 Won 1,454,175, 175,000 B JJJ 92Meu96,682,682,000 won, KRW 998,526,000 CK 868 square meters, KRW 1/2421,58,520,521,520, and the appraisal of the land to be expropriated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “G”), and the fact that the evidence No. 1,421,25, and No. 251,520 won among the shares of KRW 868 square meters in DK 868, and No. 361,25,21,255, and No. 251,520