logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.09.13 2016구합67776
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor is a legal entity established on February 7, 201 and ordinarily employs approximately two hundred workers, who are engaged in the production and sales of broadcast programs, and the Plaintiff is a person who was employed by the Intervenor on November 16, 201 and works as the head of the general affairs team.

B. The intervenor: 2

B. (1) As seen in paragraph (1), in the course of performing civil litigation related to C’s embezzlement case, which served as the Intervenor’s head of the Intervenor’s management support office, the Plaintiff was considered to have been audited on October 20, 2015. (c) On October 21, 2015, the Intervenor’s head of the Intervenor’s management planning headquarters requested disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. On October 22, 2015, the Intervenor is deemed to be “Disciplinary Committee” except where the Intervenor directly cited the original text.

was notified that it was held.

However, the plaintiff did not participate in the above disciplinary committee for reasons of health.

On October 27, 2015, the intervenor continued the procedure and decided to hold a new disciplinary committee and notified the plaintiff thereof.

However, on October 27, 2015, the plaintiff sent to the intervenor a certificate of content that the auditor is invalid, that the intervenor cannot agree to the proceedings of the intervenor as follows, and that the disciplinary committee requested the reservation of the disciplinary procedure: The auditor of the company who attended the disciplinary committee shall be deemed to have been conducted as the plaintiff was committed in the strong atmosphere of the employee of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company

With respect to the holding of a disciplinary action: He/she wishes to hold a disciplinary action after the legal judgment that he/she notified the plaintiff of his/her intention to file a complaint or accusation, and he/she wishes to do so for a sufficient time for the recovery of health due to health reasons, but he/she has forced him/her to give a statement, such as sending a certificate of content arrival prior to the day of the disciplinary action.

arrow