logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.16 2013고단344
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(Formationized Criminal Power) On December 26, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Suwon District Court to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and on July 12, 2012 from the Busan District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 4 million as an identical crime.

On October 26, 2012, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle on October 26, 2012, driven Csch Rexrothon vehicle from approximately one kilometer to the road in front of the Busan Cheongcheon-gu Museum located in the 3-17-17, in the state of under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.161%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. A report on the situation of the driver without a license, a report on the status of the driver without a license, and a report on the status of the driver without a license;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (attached reporting, such as a copy of a summary order of the same attached power);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime, and subparagraphs 1, and 43 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (The execution of a sentence against the accused shall be suspended only once, taking into account the fact that the accused has been able to have the same criminal records, but the accused has not committed any second offense as his/her depth has been divided, and the result of sentencing conducted by the probation office has taken into account the

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

arrow