logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.05.21 2014가단96700
대여금
Text

1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant B is within the scope of the property inherited from the network G jointly with Defendant E and F.

Reasons

In addition, around October 21, 1997, Plus Mutual Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (the former Mutual Savings Bank is the Dong Mutual Savings Bank; hereinafter the same shall apply) lent KRW 90 million to Thai-si Co., Ltd., and G and H jointly guaranteed the obligation to return the borrowed money to the instant bank of Thai-si Co., Ltd... The instant bank filed a lawsuit against G and H (this Court Order 2004No 11041), and filed a lawsuit against the instant bank for the return of the loan (this Court Decision 29,475,301 won) with the court on January 10, 205, "G and H are jointly and severally liable to pay the instant bank 29,475,301 won, and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time, and the remaining inheritor and heir were not reported to the instant bank on June 27, 2006, and the Plaintiffs were deceased on June 14, 2006.

According to the above facts, within the scope of the property inherited from the network G jointly with Defendant E and F, Defendant B is obligated to pay KRW 10,071,497 to the Plaintiffs, and Defendant C and D respectively to pay KRW 6,714,32 to the extent of the property inherited from the network G. As the Plaintiffs seek, Defendant E and Defendant F are jointly and severally obligated to pay KRW 14,100,097 to the extent of the property inherited from the network H, within the scope of the property inherited from the network H.

If so,

arrow