beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 22,654,928 as well as 20% per annum from July 8, 2014 to the day of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 27, 2013, B entered into a long-term lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the purpose of transporting home delivery officers belonging to C B B B B, with the total vehicle amount of KRW 29,000,000,000,000 in the Plaintiff’s name (hereinafter “instant contract”).
B. Meanwhile, in the instant contract, B paid KRW 12,484,007 ( KRW 6,00,000, KRW 484,007 on October 27, 2013, and KRW 6,000 on November 16, 2013, and KRW 6,000 on the remaining 12-month installment payments) out of the total vehicle amount to the Plaintiff, and paid KRW 16,987,034,030 on the balance of the vehicle installment payments ( KRW 1,043,020 on a monthly basis) to the Plaintiff, and paid KRW 80,00 on a monthly basis to the Plaintiff.
C. The Plaintiff, after entering into the instant contract, remitted the transport income to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant, as the settlement amount calculated by deducting management expenses, etc. from the transport income that was paid from the Dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong Do, and the total of KRW 7,047,281 on January 6, 2014, and KRW 7,047,281 on February 14, 2014, but did not receive the transport income of the said vehicle from March 2014.
원고는 차량할부금 2014. 2.∽2014. 5.분 4,172,080원을 캐피탈에 납부하였고, 차량 명의대여자로서 주식회사 한진(주유소)에 위 차량의 외상유류대금 9,982,848원을 지급하였다.
또한 원고는 위 차량대금 12,484,007원 중 4,500,000원, 관리비 2014. 2.∽2014. 5.분 4,000,000원을 지급받지 못하였다.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 12 (including virtual number) and the purport of whole pleading
2. The parties' assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff initially entered into a long-term lease contract with B on the said vehicle, and thereafter, the Defendant agreed to accept the status of the said vehicle and the instant contract with B, and requested the Plaintiff to transfer the transportation revenue to the Defendant upon requesting the consent.
Accordingly, the plaintiff accepted this and remitted the settlement of transport profit to the defendant.
However, the defendant.