beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 5, 2018 to July 9, 2020 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was established for the purpose of online information provision business, human resources supply business, employment mediation business, etc., and operated an Internet website that provides information on medical services such as nurses and job offering and job seeking with job offering and job seeking specialized in nursing.
B. On September 25, 2003, the Defendant was a company that operated D (D; hereinafter “Defendant D website”) which was established for the purpose of the operation of the employment website, etc. and was in charge of searching employment information, and completed the provision and operation of Defendant D website services on May 4, 2020.
In addition, the Defendant also operates various Internet web-site providing employment information, such as E, F, G, and H (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant’s other web-site”).
C. The Plaintiff website shall classify and publish the employment information related to the types of nursing occupation in the form as shown in attached Form 1. The type of occupation, field, region, type of hospital, type of employment type, etc., and each employment information shall include the name of the recruitment company, the type of occupation, major, type of employment, work field, work area, neighboring subway, working hours, wages, number of employees, recruitment period, qualifications for application, welfare benefits, and the names and contact numbers of the recruitment officer.
From September 2015, the Defendant visited the web site on a mechanical basis, and collected C employment information, etc. by means of cring which stores the relevant information on a separate server, and processed some of the information, and provided Defendant D website with employment information corresponding to search language for users in the form as shown in attached Form 3.
E. On March 23, 2018, the Plaintiff resisted on the act of providing employment information collected from the Defendant on the Plaintiff’s website, and the Defendant is the Plaintiff’s website employment information from the Defendant’s website.