The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact-finding that the defendant recognized the facts of the crime and reflects the depth of the crime, that the theft was returned to the victim, that the defendant deposited KRW 300,000 in the court below for the victim of the larceny, that the defendant paid the credit card use fee in full, etc. However, in light of the contents of the crime, the crime of this case is not less complicated, that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated period, that the defendant committed the crime of this case, that the crime of intrusion at night is limited to imprisonment with prison labor, and that the crime of larceny at night is limited to imprisonment with prison labor, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument is not unfair because the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.