1. The defendant shall draw the "survey Results Map" in the attached Form 896, among the attached Form C 896, to the plaintiff (designated parties) and the designated parties.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 7, Gap evidence 13, Eul evidence 14-1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 6-3:

The owner of K 1107 square meters (hereinafter “the land before the subdivision of this case”) was L.

B. L died on April 8, 1966, and the land before the instant subdivision was inherited by M et al. and six other persons.

C. M entered into a contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) on May 12, 1975 with N on May 12, 1975, prior to the registration of inheritance on the land prior to the instant subdivision in the name of his heir, including himself, to sell 100 square meters of the land prior to the instant subdivision (hereinafter “the instant land”). N prior to the purchase of the land prior to the instant sale and purchase, he received all the sales proceeds pursuant to the instant sales contract on two occasions on May 12, 1975 and December 23, 1975.

N removed the existing grassland that existed on the land sold in this case, and then newly constructed cement block structure and sap 1 and 16 square meters of dried house (hereinafter “the instant house”). On November 11, 1975, the registration of ownership preservation was completed on the land under the Plaintiff’s name, one of the lands located on the subdivision of the instant land before the subdivision in this case, but the registration of preservation was completed as if it was located on the OM number in the adjacent small-scale 10 square meters of 16 square meters of dried house (hereinafter “instant house”). The above O lot number is not located on the land before the subdivision in this case, as seen below.

E. M et al., the inheritor of L, et al., shall complete the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of all inheritors with respect to the land before the subdivision of this case and divide it into eight parcels on April 3, 197, which was then divided into eight parcels, under the name of the plaintiff of this case.