The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of this case is that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant while the defendant was asked by the police officers to check the facts of the central crime by drinking, such as drinking, smelling, etc., and thus, the defendant tried to avoid the crime even though he was required by the police officers to take a drinking test, and to escape from the police officers, and restrain him, the police officers G are able to take a bath, and he did not comply with the request for a drinking test by the police officers on three occasions or one time due to his hand and hand, and he did not comply with the request for a drinking test by the police officers without any justifiable reason. In light of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment and two times of fines) with prison labor (one year of suspended sentence and 40 hours of a compliance driving instruction as of June) as sentenced by the court below, it is too unfair.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor of the judgment, the following circumstances are considered: (a) the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant; (b) the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant; (c) the criminal records of the defendant are prior to 2000; and (d) the defendant does not repeat again; and (c) the defendant’s character, conduct and environment of the defendant; (d) the background and result of each of the instant crimes; and (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (e) the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence imposed by the court below is un

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.