1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The defendant alleged the claim on June 29, 2016.

1. Facts recognized;

A. The Plaintiff’s position 1) The entry of “stock company” in the name of all the Company A (hereinafter “stock company”) is omitted.

)는 건설산업기본법에 따른 토목건축공사업, 산업설비공사, 설계시공사업, 도급업 등을 영위하는 중소기업자가 아닌 사업자 ‘중소기업기본법’ 제2조 제1항의 규정에 의한 중소기업자를 말하며, 건설업의 경우 상시근로자수 300명 미만 또는 자본금 30억 원 이하인 경우 중소기업자에 해당한다. 로서 대우건설 등 수 개의 중소기업자에게 건설공사를 위탁한 자이므로 하도급거래 공정화에 관한 법률(이하 ‘하도급법’이라 한다

(2) On September 3, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court decided to commence rehabilitation proceedings against A, and the Plaintiff, a representative director, deemed a custodian.

(hereinafter referred to as “A” or “Plaintiff” without distinguishing between a rehabilitation company and the Plaintiff.

The defendant's past disposition 1) corrective order and penalty surcharge payment order A) the construction of soil and reinforced concrete construction to 14 subcontractors, such as large construction, etc., A did not pay the subcontract price within 60 days from the date of acquisition of the object (hereinafter referred to as "legal payment date"), or did not pay the subcontractor the progress payment within 15 days from the date of receiving the progress payment from the ordering person.

On May 22, 2014, the Defendant issued a corrective order and penalty surcharge order to A on the ground that the above act violates Article 13(1) and (3) of the Subcontract Act.

B. A, after entrusting 8 major subcontractors with the construction of soil and reinforced concrete, etc., A shall not pay part of the subcontract price within the statutory payment deadline, and the overdue interest for the overdue period shall be paid when the subcontract price in arrears is paid.