A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 10:20 on April 8, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant, while driving a low-priced car on the front road of Guro-gu Seoul apartment, Seoul, for the reason that he violated traffic laws and regulations.

Defendant: “Iscopians to be designated”

“Absently sound, the vehicle door of the driver’s seat caused the above E’s bucks in front of the vehicle, and after getting off from the vehicle, the vehicle eared “E’s Habbbbbbbbs,” and re-stamped the E’s ear, “I ambbs, so on, and how I ambs, and how I ambs,” and E explained the violation, and the defect described E to take the form of E as a PDA for traffic control.

PDA's flag was deducted.

Defendant: (a) continued to enter the Defendant’s arms to move to Daa and the roadway of the same police station in the vicinity of the Defendant; (b) taken the above F and E on a cell phone with the cell phone; and (c) taken the video image of the said F and E by h on his hand.

Then, the said F and E were threatened by stating “I see later,” and “I see later.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties for traffic control and prevention of traffic danger by assaulting and threatening F and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of the CDA (CCTV, PDA video)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (referring to each damaged police officer);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion intentionally did not commit violence to E by pushing with or spuckbucks, which part of the bucks and ear in E.

In addition, there was no intimidation against one police officer.

2. The term “Assault” in relation to the obstruction of the performance of official duties means a public official.